Welcome to our blog.

We are awesome!

Friday, March 23, 2012

Blog Post 7: Losing Isaiah Review



    As a group, while we didn’t think “Losing Isaiah” wasn’t the most quality of films, it successfully presented many important ethical issues in adoption.

    First, the birth mothers rights were completely ignored. This is evident when Halle Berry’s character Khaila, isn’t given any papers when the adoption is finalized with Margret and Charles. Although she left her child in the garbage at the start of the film, she is still the birth mother and was not informed of what was happening with her child. The film did a good job at portraying the emotions of a woman who has lost her child. Halle Berry’s character was clearly a mourning mother, as she was caring for her friend’s children and never forgets about her own baby. It also shows both sides of a story, which is important in understanding a situation as complicated as this.

    The film displayed racial issues in adoption in an accurate way. The scene in the bathroom with Margret and Khaila was representative of the silent racism in society as they begin using race as a weapon against one another when it’s really the situation that they’re feeling hostile about. Another good example is the courtroom scene where Samuel L Jackson’s character is questioning Margret about how she’s culturing Isaiah and it’s clear that she isn’t introducing any black culture to him on purpose. It’s shown on the lawyer’s face that this is a problem for his case. The film blatantly states several times that a black child should be with it’s black mother. Whether this is proven to be true cannot be known because at the end both families come together to raise the child in both cultures.

    After watching the film, it seems that there are both positive and negative sides of adoption shown. An example of the negative would be the judicial fighting over who the child should live with, the emotional rollercoaster on both sides, and potentially scarring Isaiah. A positive example would be that he is not left alone in the hospital but has people he can rely on and a good home. However, the positive seems to outweigh the negative because it’s getting the issue across of race in adoption to the general viewing public.

Losing Isaiah. Dir. Stephen Gyllenhaal. 1995. DVD.

Judy Post 6
Michael Post 6
Mickey Post 7
Jenna Post 6

2 comments:

  1. GRADED REPLY

    I think you all provided a great grasp of the ethical issues that are present in the movie. I like how you provided multiple perspectives and touched on how difficult and sensitive a situation like that would be. I think it is hard to generally say that the mother's rights were completely ignored. I agree that she did not receive adequate notification of the probable, and then complete adoption of her child. However, the mother had completely violated the rights of the child several times. I remember the hospital mentioning that Halle Berry's character Khaila had had incidents in the hospital several times in relation to her child. Margret had stated that she recommended social work intervention in Isaiah's life several times before the incident when they found him in the dumpster. So in the sense that she did not receive adequate notification of her child being adopted, yes Khaila's rights were violated. But she had put her child in harm so many times, that I think it would be hard for anyone to agree that she should have kept her child. Unfortunately, the loss of her child fueled the motivation for her to get clean and stay clean, which in the end made her able to fight for her child. Do you think she would have gotten clean if the hospital and social workers let her have Isaiah back after he was almost crushed in the trash compactor? I think that would be something to think about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. GRADED REPLY

    I agree with your argument about the court scenes. There are a lot of arguments about keeping adoptees with adoptive families that are the same race in order to avoid teasing and also for the culture of the child. In the movie, they made that point very clear when the adoption agency representative straight up said that they like to put adoptees with adoptive families of the same race. Isaiah clearly did not see a difference between his white adoptive family and himself. In the bathroom scene where Hannah is blowing bubbles with Isaiah, they put their hands together and Hannah asked what the difference was between their hands. All that Isaiah saw was that his was smaller, not that his was black and hers was white. I think this shows that love can overpower race. On the other hand, the movie did not show at all that Isaiah’s adoptive family was trying to teach him about his culture. It may have been in their plans for when he was a bit older and could understand it more. Good post!

    Katie A.

    ReplyDelete