Welcome to our blog.

We are awesome!

Monday, March 26, 2012

Book Review: "The Kid"


Savage, Dan.  The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant.  NY: Plume, 2000 246 pages.
     Dan Savage is writer for a sex-advice column, “Savage Love.”  He and his partner Terry decided to adopt a child, and this is their journey of adopting as two gay fathers. 
     This piece of writing is a memoir that entails the struggles that gay fathers go through when adopting in the United States.  However, Savage uses a lot of blunt comedy to express the struggles.
     Rating: 1) I highly recommend this book for same-sex parents wanting to adopt and to supporters of same-sex adoption looking for a heartwarming story. 
     Clemens Library already owns this book.
     One topic that this memoir touches on very well is open adoption.  Savage states, “In an open adoption, the pregnant woman, called the birth mother in agency-speak, selects a family for her child, and has a mutually agreeable amount of ongoing contact with her child, usually two or three visits a year, with photos and letters exchanged at set times,” (Savage, 6).  Savage describes as the adoption with no secrets.  He makes it clear that him and his partner decided to do this in the best interest of the birth mother, as both of them have high respect for her.  Still, the open adoption comes with challenges and fears.
     One fear Dan and Terry face is wondering what the birth mother will be like.  They start to learn about open adoption from their friends Bob and Kate.  At first Bob scares Dan when starts to tell Dan and Terry that the birth mother chooses the adoptive parents from a pool.  Dan goes into a state of questions in his mind after hearing this.  For example, he states, “The birth mom chooses?  She comes to visit?  What if she’s a drunk or a drug addict?  Won’t the kid be confused?  What is she wants her kid back?” (Savage, 46).  When Bob explains open adoption in depth later on, Savage gives the reader a better and positive understanding.  The description talks about the couple and the birth mother making a lot of decisions together to make sure they are on the same page.  Some people are probably scared of open adoption, but Savage’s friend Kate states, “In open adoption, the birth mom can come and that her baby is okay, and go on with her life.  She is empowered by her decisions and soothed by the information she has about where her baby is.  She knows, she doesn’t have to worry,” (Savage, 47).
     To support the case of open adoption, Savage describes the interaction that they have with the birth mother, Melissa.  Melissa is a gutter punk with a history of some drugs and alcohol.  A gutter punk is a homeless person by choice.  She is smart and intelligent, and she could find a job if she wanted to.  However, Melissa decided to be a gutter punk after a poor family history.  She scares Dan and Terry when she tells about the amount of beer she had the beginning of her pregnancy, but she stopped right away.  For part of the memoir, they fear the effects of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, but the ultra sounds show that the baby boy is healthy.
     Besides Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, the couple fears Melissa wanting to take the baby back after the baby is born.   However, she tries to comfort Dan and Terry saying she won’t change her mind, but Dan and Terry try to prepare themselves for the worst.  They wouldn’t even let their families buy any baby clothing or items because they didn’t want to jinx it.  In the end, Melissa does sign off on the adoption after coming to an agreement on visits and photo exchanging. 
     Finally, another challenge that Dan and Terry face with Melissa is deciding the name of the baby boy.  Dan and Terry wanted to name Daryl Jude while Melissa wants to name him David Kevin.  When they try to discuss names with Melissa, she becomes defensive and emotional.  She states, “I want to name him.  You can change his name later on, I don’t care.  But I want to give him his names and my family’s last name; it’s important to me.  When you adopt him, you can do what you want,” (Savage 138).  This part of the book gives the reader a deeper understanding of what the birth mother feels going through open adoption.  Even though her child is going through adoption, mother still face pains and emotions to the child they are caring. 
     Besides open adoption, another main topic of this memoir is the same-sex parenting topic.  First, Dan and Terry fear what society is going to say when they adopt their child.  For example, when the two attend a session for prospective parents, Dan sits in the conference room with a million thoughts going through his head as he looks around the room.  One of his thoughts included religion, and how prospective parents describe themselves in their letters.
     “More than half described themselves as Christian.  Not all Christians hate homos, of course, and some Christians are themselves homos.  But still, in America in the late nineties, it’s safe to assume that most people who go out their way to let you know they’re Christians don’t care for homos.  So, come to think of it, odds seemed pretty good that someone at the table believed that my boyfriend and I were going to hell, and had no right to take a baby down with us,” (Savage 15).
     Savage describes this behavior as being attached, “to our own oppression,” (Savage 15).  This is evident through out the book as well.  Dan and Terry continue to worry about what other people are going to think about two men being parents and raising a child.  Not only do they worry about themselves, but also about the baby.  During one of their meetings with Melissa, Dan says to her, “It’s something we’ve thought about.  He’ll have different experiences group up with gay dads than kids who grow up with straight parents.  There are places we won’t be able to go as a family, and times in his life he might catch shit for it.  Do you worry about this?” (Savage 133).  Melissa of course didn’t care about Dan and Terry being two men.  She describes them as “different,” (Savage 132), and she liked that about them.  However, Dan did ask some realistic questions about the baby’s future. 
     Finally, after the baby is born, Dan and Terry face some rough times when they travel.  During one experience on a flight to Chicago, the woman at the ticket counter thought that Dan and Terry may have stolen the baby because the he had Melissa’s last name and no mother.  Dan described how worried the woman looked, and she almost called security.  Now Dan and Terry carry the birth certificate around whenever they travel.  Still, the trouble didn’t end there.  The flight attendants and even one of the pilots asked Dan and Terry’s son, “Where is mommy?” or “Did these two boys steal you from your mommy?” (Savage 228).  The book depicts the challenges that gay fathers when taking care of their child.  Our society assumes that in order for a child to live he must have one mother and one father.  Plus, it’s interested that the woman at the ticket counter thought that Dan and Terry were stealing the baby because a woman was not present. 
     Open adoption and gay and lesbian parenting are the two main topics in the book.  However, the reader will find brief information the adoption laws of Oregon and birth father rights.  For example, “If a birth dad wasn’t around, it he wasn’t providing emotional and financial support during the pregnancy, under Oregon law he had already signed away his rights,” (Savage 49).  The birth father shows up at the very end of Savage’s memoir, and it turns out to be a good experience for Dan and Terry.  I recommend “The Kid” for anyone who wants to learn about a gay fathering experience.  It gives the reader a sense of gay adoption in a very straight society. 

-Mickey N.         


5 comments:

  1. Book Review Graded Reply #2

    Mickey,

    I was immediately interested in your blogpost when I read the title of this book. Initially, I thought this would be a memoir about a sarcastic, teenage couple that got pregnant and decided to give up a baby for adoption. However, I was wrong and it is actually about a gay couple's adoption. Reading the way this book was written, I think it would be a fun read. The writer seems to write with some sarcasm and humor. I think it is interesting how this couple went through two very hard experiences of adoption- gay adoption and open adoption.

    In relation to your discussion of open adoption, I was a little disappointed in this birthmother's requests. I understand the point of open adoption is to allow the birthmother to keep in touch with the child every once and a while, but I think the birthmother receives a little too much priority in this case. I understand that this couple complied with everything she asked for because they really wanted the child, however I don't agree with her naming the child. I feel I have a pretty good understanding, after reading a book about birthmothers and relinquishment, of how hard it is to give up a child. Yet, it was her choice and when she made that choice she gave up her parental rights, so I think the adoptive family should name the child and have some type of limit on the amount of time the birthmother can see the child. Some limits need to be set; otherwise the birthmothers can take advantage of the adoptive family because they have the decision making role of giving the child up for adoption.

    I think in addition, gay adoption, on top of open adoption, was quite the situation for this couple to go through. Even though I was slightly annoyed by this mother's reaction to open adoption, I am happy she didn't mind this couple is gay. I think gay adoption is important to keep in mind, but living with a gay couple does not cause any proven negative effects in the child. I hope over time society becomes more open to this idea of adoption and does not automatically assume a child is kidnapped or not with their parents because there is not a woman involved.

    This book being rated as high as you rated it means this author did a great job incorporating two very large issues of adoption in one memoir. I think the child in this situation is really benefiting from the open adoption because he may live with two men, but also gets a maternal bond with his birthmother at the same time.

    Steph

    ReplyDelete
  2. Book Review Graded Reply #1

    Mickey-
    First to answer a few of your questions: Open adoption was not discussed. I think one of the reasons for this is that the two children he adopted had been in an orphanage for a while. It was clear that their mothers did not want anything to do with them. Also, since it is an international adoption, open adoption I would have to imagine is much less common (I do not know for sure!). I do not think it ever crossed Paul’s mind, and if it did, it wasn’t a significant enough though to include in the book. I am happy to hear about the mother in your book who did drugs and the child turned out fine! Paul did not explore much in the US after finding out his chance was low to have a healthy child.

    It is interesting that your author used comedy to express his struggles. The author of my book just laid it out straight. He did not try to sugar coat it or make a joke out of it. That is clearly just a personality difference!

    It is interesting to hear about the relationship that the adoptive couple and the adoptive mother had in your story. In my book, the adoptive parents did not know much at all about the birthmother or much health history. It would be much harder I think to meet the birthmother and watch her go through the process.

    After seeing some similarities, but mostly differences between our two books, I am very interested in reading yours and getting a broader perspective about gay adoption!

    Katie

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mickey, I think you did a great job with your book report! I agree with Steph that I also think that this would be a very fun book to read, especially with his humor and sarcasm. I can imagine that since he is a writer for a sex-advice column, he is very honest and can make light of some pretty serious topics.

    I found Dan and Terry’s experience to be very honest and realistic. I found it very interesting when you talked about how “they wouldn’t even let their families buy any baby clothes or items because they didn’t want to jinx it.” I think that this would be very hard to be in Dan and Terry’s position with all of the uncertainty. Compared to a pregnant couple having nerves about how they will be as parents, if they are prepared enough, how the birth will go, if they bought the right toys, etc. adoptive parents like Dan and Terry have the additional stress of the birthmother backing out. I think that would be such a hard experience and something that was always on the back of my mind. I am glad the adoption worked for them!

    I also found it very interesting how Melissa, the birthmother, wanted to name the baby. Is this something that she brought up or did Dan and Terry bring that up? I think that would put all of them in a very awkward position. Dan and Terry would want to respect Melissa’s wishes because they do not want her to back out of the adoption and I am sure they are internally grateful for her selecting them to be parents of their child. However, they must also want to create their own identity for their son. What did they end up deciding?

    The stories with the trouble they experienced at the airport would be so hard to experience. I am glad they seemed like they were ok with the situation, however I do not think that I would have handled that situation as calmly. I am hopeful that experiences like this do not happen again.

    Thanks again for your review and I think that I may have to read this soon!

    Kathryn M.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Book Review Graded Reply #1

    Mickey- Your book seems like it was quite an interesting read and after reading this book review I think I would re ally enjoy reading it and learning more about some of the issues that same-sex couples face in adopting a child that are different than heterosexual couples.

    I thought it was interesting that the birthmother didn't seem at all concerned about, or interested in discussing, the fact that her child would be adopted by a same-sex couple. I am not saying she should have been upset by it or anything like that but I do think she should have actually thought about it more. It seems like Dan was thinking about some of the realities that they and the child would face and some of the discrimination or harassment that they could face in the future.

    As others have commented as well I thought the exchange between the birthmother and the adoptive parents about the name of the child was interesting. I can see where the mother was concerned and wanted to be able to give her child the names from her family but at the same time I also think that she had given up that right by placing her baby for adoption. That is definitely a concern regarding open adoption that I had never considered.

    I really enjoyed reading your book review, good job!

    Merideth E.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Book Review Response #2
    I myself am not very familiar with same-sex/gay adoption, but your book review gave me a great overview of the turmoil these individuals unfortunately face. Your responses to the book gave a great understanding of the challenges these two adoptive fathers experienced having adopted in a same-sex interrelationship. I was aware that some individuals look down upon same-sex adoption, but the thought of people thinking this couple “stole” the baby never crossed my mind. Discrimination against this population still occurs and not if the adoption process is already difficult but being involved in same-sex partnership makes it that much more problematic.
    I really liked how you incorporated the birthmother standpoint of naming her child. In class, we have discussed the choicelessness birthmothers encounter and this is one of several issues. Something just as simple as naming the child can make the birthmother feel like she has a slight sense of control over the situation. In the quote you had pointed out in your book review, the reader can grasp an idea of the emotions running in the birthmother’s head and how important how just naming the child is one aspect she would like to be involved in before she gives up her child.
    Your book review did a fine job not only describing the process of open adoption, but the discernment same-sex couples face when wanting to adopt. Who is to say that same-sex couples can’t be good parents? No one. They are humans with the exact same rights as heterosexuals so it’s unfair to discriminate against a population who wishes to fulfill their family. Excellent job again Mickey!

    ReplyDelete